<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 371 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210600</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that interest income should not be excluded for calculating the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court determined that the interest income should be assessed under the head &quot;Profits &amp;amp; Gains of Business and Profession&quot; rather than as business income. The appellant&#039;s argument that the interest income was essential for conducting business was not supported by sufficient evidence, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Case Appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 371 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210600</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that interest income should not be excluded for calculating the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court determined that the interest income should be assessed under the head &quot;Profits &amp;amp; Gains of Business and Profession&quot; rather than as business income. The appellant&#039;s argument that the interest income was essential for conducting business was not supported by sufficient evidence, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Case Appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>