<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 676 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of polyester metallised/plastic film, in a case involving the applicability of Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules and the valuation of goods cleared on a stock transfer basis for captive consumption. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s actions of reversing the proportionate Cenvat credit and using the price at which goods were sold to independent buyers were justified, dismissing the department&#039;s demands for payment based on different valuation methods. The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant by waiving the pre-deposit requirement and staying the recovery until the appeals were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 676 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of polyester metallised/plastic film, in a case involving the applicability of Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules and the valuation of goods cleared on a stock transfer basis for captive consumption. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s actions of reversing the proportionate Cenvat credit and using the price at which goods were sold to independent buyers were justified, dismissing the department&#039;s demands for payment based on different valuation methods. The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant by waiving the pre-deposit requirement and staying the recovery until the appeals were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>