<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 157 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210573</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, ruling in favor of the Petitioner. The Court found that there was no failure on the Petitioner&#039;s part to disclose material facts fully and truly, and the jurisdictional conditions for reopening the assessment beyond four years were not met. The Petitioner&#039;s challenge against the validity of the certificate issued under Section 195(2) versus Section 197 was upheld, clarifying that the certificate was indeed issued under Section 195(2). The Petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 157 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210573</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, ruling in favor of the Petitioner. The Court found that there was no failure on the Petitioner&#039;s part to disclose material facts fully and truly, and the jurisdictional conditions for reopening the assessment beyond four years were not met. The Petitioner&#039;s challenge against the validity of the certificate issued under Section 195(2) versus Section 197 was upheld, clarifying that the certificate was indeed issued under Section 195(2). The Petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>