<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 717 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of Rs. 7,78,67,696/- in differential customs duty under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. It confirmed the inclusion of payments in the assessable value of imported goods and the imposition of a penalty on the appellant. The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal for the liability to pay interest under Section 28AB of the Customs Act, 1962. Confiscation of goods was upheld, but the redemption fine was set aside. The penalty on the appellant&#039;s employee was also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 717 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of Rs. 7,78,67,696/- in differential customs duty under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. It confirmed the inclusion of payments in the assessable value of imported goods and the imposition of a penalty on the appellant. The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal for the liability to pay interest under Section 28AB of the Customs Act, 1962. Confiscation of goods was upheld, but the redemption fine was set aside. The penalty on the appellant&#039;s employee was also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>