https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210553 The High Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India while an appeal was pending before the Supreme Court challenging the order of the CESTAT, Chennai. The Court emphasized that since the Supreme Court was already seized of the matter and had issued notices to the respondents, it was not within the High Court's purview to intervene at this stage. Therefore, the High Court deemed it inappropriate to entertain the writ petition and dismissed it without imposing any costs on the petitioner. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210553 The High Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India while an appeal was pending before the Supreme Court challenging the order of the CESTAT, Chennai. The Court emphasized that since the Supreme Court was already seized of the matter and had issued notices to the respondents, it was not within the High Court's purview to intervene at this stage. Therefore, the High Court deemed it inappropriate to entertain the writ petition and dismissed it without imposing any costs on the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210553