<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 137 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was unwarranted as the payments to foreign shipping companies were not taxable in India. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering taxability before invoking tax deduction provisions under section 195. The judgment highlighted the significance of Circulars issued by CBDT in interpreting tax laws accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 137 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was unwarranted as the payments to foreign shipping companies were not taxable in India. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering taxability before invoking tax deduction provisions under section 195. The judgment highlighted the significance of Circulars issued by CBDT in interpreting tax laws accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>