<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 703 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the first appellate authority&#039;s decision to allow depreciation claims by the assessees. It concluded that the depreciation claims did not result in double deduction and that the assessees had complied with the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by relevant case laws and a detailed analysis of the statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 703 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the first appellate authority&#039;s decision to allow depreciation claims by the assessees. It concluded that the depreciation claims did not result in double deduction and that the assessees had complied with the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by relevant case laws and a detailed analysis of the statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>