https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210514 The case involved a dispute over the admissibility of CENVAT Credit for various input services utilized by the appellants in manufacturing excisable goods. The judge, Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, relied on previous tribunal decisions and legal interpretations to determine that the appellant was eligible for CENVAT Credit for the disputed services. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellant in the form of confirmed CENVAT Credit amounts along with interest and penalties under Rule 15(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. en-us Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2016 12:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210514 The case involved a dispute over the admissibility of CENVAT Credit for various input services utilized by the appellants in manufacturing excisable goods. The judge, Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, relied on previous tribunal decisions and legal interpretations to determine that the appellant was eligible for CENVAT Credit for the disputed services. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellant in the form of confirmed CENVAT Credit amounts along with interest and penalties under Rule 15(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210514