<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 362 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty liability on cotton yarn in cone, cheese forms, dismissing the appeals challenging the reliance on third-party statements and alleging a violation of natural justice principles. The appellants&#039; failure to request cross-examination during the adjudication stage and lack of evidence supporting their claims led to the confirmation of duty liability, interest, and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 362 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty liability on cotton yarn in cone, cheese forms, dismissing the appeals challenging the reliance on third-party statements and alleging a violation of natural justice principles. The appellants&#039; failure to request cross-examination during the adjudication stage and lack of evidence supporting their claims led to the confirmation of duty liability, interest, and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>