<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 691 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210511</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that zinc ash is not an excisable good under the Central Excise Tariff Act. Therefore, no duty is leviable on zinc ash produced during the manufacturing process of zinc oxide, despite the appellants availing Cenvat credit on duty-paid zinc ash. The Tribunal based its decision on previous decisions, including a case involving Vishal Pipes and decisions by the Supreme Court, concluding that zinc ash does not undergo a manufacturing process and is not subject to excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 691 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210511</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that zinc ash is not an excisable good under the Central Excise Tariff Act. Therefore, no duty is leviable on zinc ash produced during the manufacturing process of zinc oxide, despite the appellants availing Cenvat credit on duty-paid zinc ash. The Tribunal based its decision on previous decisions, including a case involving Vishal Pipes and decisions by the Supreme Court, concluding that zinc ash does not undergo a manufacturing process and is not subject to excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>