https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210510 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in a Central Excise case, setting aside the order demanding differential duty, interest, and penalties. It held that the extended notice invoking the extended period was time-barred and that the cleaning charges for bottles were not liable for duty payment. The Tribunal referenced legal precedents to support its decision, emphasizing that the extended period cannot be invoked without wilful suppression and that the issue regarding cleaning charges had already been settled in a previous case. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210510 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in a Central Excise case, setting aside the order demanding differential duty, interest, and penalties. It held that the extended notice invoking the extended period was time-barred and that the cleaning charges for bottles were not liable for duty payment. The Tribunal referenced legal precedents to support its decision, emphasizing that the extended period cannot be invoked without wilful suppression and that the issue regarding cleaning charges had already been settled in a previous case. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210510