<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 123 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210506</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Appropriate Authority&#039;s order, emphasizing the need to consider historical transaction details for property valuation. The court directed the respondent to grant the No Objection Certificate within four weeks, highlighting the importance of determining fair market value based on actual transaction history and comparable instances, as established in legal precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 123 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210506</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Appropriate Authority&#039;s order, emphasizing the need to consider historical transaction details for property valuation. The court directed the respondent to grant the No Objection Certificate within four weeks, highlighting the importance of determining fair market value based on actual transaction history and comparable instances, as established in legal precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>