https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210497 A procedural irregularity in constituting a Human Rights Commission bench did not amount to a jurisdictional nullity, because the governing procedure allowed complaints to be placed before a single-member bench and referred to a larger bench if needed. Pendency of related proceedings before the police or criminal court did not bar the Commission from examining an alleged human rights violation within its statutory domain. Interrogation continued till about 3.30 A.M. was treated as inconsistent with human dignity and could support a finding of human rights violation, but the proposed recovery of compensation from officials was quashed because they had not been given the reasonable opportunity of hearing required before their reputation could be prejudicially affected. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210497 A procedural irregularity in constituting a Human Rights Commission bench did not amount to a jurisdictional nullity, because the governing procedure allowed complaints to be placed before a single-member bench and referred to a larger bench if needed. Pendency of related proceedings before the police or criminal court did not bar the Commission from examining an alleged human rights violation within its statutory domain. Interrogation continued till about 3.30 A.M. was treated as inconsistent with human dignity and could support a finding of human rights violation, but the proposed recovery of compensation from officials was quashed because they had not been given the reasonable opportunity of hearing required before their reputation could be prejudicially affected. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210497