<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 677 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210485</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax on technical testing and analysis services used in exports could not be denied merely because the exporter did not produce a separate written agreement with the buyer under Notification No. 41/2007-Service Tax, as amended. The Tribunal applied a liberal construction to export benefit provisions, noting that the export of goods, payment of service tax, and export nexus were undisputed, and that the buyer&#039;s instructions through the letter of credit and the inspection certificate supported the claim. Procedural lapses were held insufficient to defeat substantive refund relief where essential conditions were otherwise satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 677 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210485</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax on technical testing and analysis services used in exports could not be denied merely because the exporter did not produce a separate written agreement with the buyer under Notification No. 41/2007-Service Tax, as amended. The Tribunal applied a liberal construction to export benefit provisions, noting that the export of goods, payment of service tax, and export nexus were undisputed, and that the buyer&#039;s instructions through the letter of credit and the inspection certificate supported the claim. Procedural lapses were held insufficient to defeat substantive refund relief where essential conditions were otherwise satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>