<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 672 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210480</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the anti-dumping duty imposed on the subject goods, as it found the injury determination by the Designated Authority to be faulty and unconvincing. Consequently, the Final Findings and Customs Notification imposing anti-dumping duty were overturned. Other grounds raised by the appellants regarding the determination of dumping were not addressed by the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 672 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210480</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the anti-dumping duty imposed on the subject goods, as it found the injury determination by the Designated Authority to be faulty and unconvincing. Consequently, the Final Findings and Customs Notification imposing anti-dumping duty were overturned. Other grounds raised by the appellants regarding the determination of dumping were not addressed by the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>