<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 670 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210478</link>
    <description>A valid DFRC certificate and the corresponding SION entry permitting import of hydroxy ethyl cellulose were treated as sufficient to support duty exemption under Notification No. 46/2002-Cus. Customs could not deny the benefit on a mere inferred absence of nexus where the export goods were not tested at export and there was no positive finding that the exported product lacked the stated input. A Joint DGFT clarification also supported permissibility, and analogous DFIA/DFRC practice accepted the authorization specifications for customs purposes. The importer was therefore entitled to the exemption and the revenue challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 670 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210478</link>
      <description>A valid DFRC certificate and the corresponding SION entry permitting import of hydroxy ethyl cellulose were treated as sufficient to support duty exemption under Notification No. 46/2002-Cus. Customs could not deny the benefit on a mere inferred absence of nexus where the export goods were not tested at export and there was no positive finding that the exported product lacked the stated input. A Joint DGFT clarification also supported permissibility, and analogous DFIA/DFRC practice accepted the authorization specifications for customs purposes. The importer was therefore entitled to the exemption and the revenue challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>