https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210452 The court found in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the communication proposing to withdraw approval of the industrial park was legally unsustainable. The court determined that the petitioner had fulfilled its obligations under the Industrial Park Scheme by providing infrastructural facilities and allocating plots, and was not responsible for ensuring the setup and operation of industrial units. Additionally, the court directed the respondents to issue the necessary notification for the petitioner's industrial park under Rule 18C(4) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210452 The court found in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the communication proposing to withdraw approval of the industrial park was legally unsustainable. The court determined that the petitioner had fulfilled its obligations under the Industrial Park Scheme by providing infrastructural facilities and allocating plots, and was not responsible for ensuring the setup and operation of industrial units. Additionally, the court directed the respondents to issue the necessary notification for the petitioner's industrial park under Rule 18C(4) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210452