<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 652 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210450</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, DELHI confirmed the service tax liability against the appellants for providing business auxiliary services to BSNL, amounting to Rs.1,60,616/- for the period from November 2004 to October 2005. A penalty of the same amount was imposed under relevant sections of the Finance Act, 1994. However, due to unclear facts in the order, specifically regarding whether the tax demand was solely for the resale of recharge coupons or included other services, the Tribunal set aside the decision and remanded the case for further clarification and verification of facts by the original adjudicating authority in accordance with precedent decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 652 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210450</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, DELHI confirmed the service tax liability against the appellants for providing business auxiliary services to BSNL, amounting to Rs.1,60,616/- for the period from November 2004 to October 2005. A penalty of the same amount was imposed under relevant sections of the Finance Act, 1994. However, due to unclear facts in the order, specifically regarding whether the tax demand was solely for the resale of recharge coupons or included other services, the Tribunal set aside the decision and remanded the case for further clarification and verification of facts by the original adjudicating authority in accordance with precedent decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>