<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 640 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210438</link>
    <description>Valuation of yarn depended on factual verification of whether octroi, transport, loading and unloading charges, manufacturing expenses and wastage were separately declared in the relevant show-cause notices and supporting records. As the annexures showed differing treatment and no merits-based finding had been recorded, the original authority had to examine the issue notice-wise and allow the appellant to adduce evidence. The proper course was fresh adjudication after hearing both sides, so the matter was remanded to the original authority for a de novo decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 640 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210438</link>
      <description>Valuation of yarn depended on factual verification of whether octroi, transport, loading and unloading charges, manufacturing expenses and wastage were separately declared in the relevant show-cause notices and supporting records. As the annexures showed differing treatment and no merits-based finding had been recorded, the original authority had to examine the issue notice-wise and allow the appellant to adduce evidence. The proper course was fresh adjudication after hearing both sides, so the matter was remanded to the original authority for a de novo decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>