<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 515 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order crediting the refund amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. It determined that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply to the refund claim concerning short-landed goods under Section 27 of the Customs Act. The appellant was granted relief, with the Tribunal finding the refund claim for short-landed goods admissible and not subject to unjust enrichment principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 515 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order crediting the refund amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. It determined that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply to the refund claim concerning short-landed goods under Section 27 of the Customs Act. The appellant was granted relief, with the Tribunal finding the refund claim for short-landed goods admissible and not subject to unjust enrichment principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>