<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 354 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210405</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the application, directing the Tribunal to refer substantial questions of law for further adjudication under the Central Excise Act, 1944. This decision aimed to clarify the interpretation of the definition of &#039;capital goods&#039; in relation to pollution control equipments and material handling machinery/equipments, ensuring consistency and accuracy in their classification under the Central Excise Rules, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 354 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210405</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the application, directing the Tribunal to refer substantial questions of law for further adjudication under the Central Excise Act, 1944. This decision aimed to clarify the interpretation of the definition of &#039;capital goods&#039; in relation to pollution control equipments and material handling machinery/equipments, ensuring consistency and accuracy in their classification under the Central Excise Rules, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>