<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 616 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210385</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal justified the deletion of the penalty levied under section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the director had utilized undisclosed income for the company without the assessee receiving any amount as a loan or deposit. The Tribunal accepted the director&#039;s explanation of the income source, which was also acknowledged by the Department. Consequently, the penalty was deleted due to the absence of any loan or deposit received by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of all appeals without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 616 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210385</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal justified the deletion of the penalty levied under section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the director had utilized undisclosed income for the company without the assessee receiving any amount as a loan or deposit. The Tribunal accepted the director&#039;s explanation of the income source, which was also acknowledged by the Department. Consequently, the penalty was deleted due to the absence of any loan or deposit received by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of all appeals without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>