<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 613 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210382</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, confirming eligibility for exemption under Section 10(B) of the Income-tax Act. The relocation of the business unit from Gujarat to Bangalore was deemed permissible, maintaining continuity and identity, entitling the assessee to claim benefits for the assessment year 1992-93. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the relocation did not disqualify the assessee from availing the exemption under Section 10(B) as there was only one unit in Bangalore with lawful permission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 613 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210382</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, confirming eligibility for exemption under Section 10(B) of the Income-tax Act. The relocation of the business unit from Gujarat to Bangalore was deemed permissible, maintaining continuity and identity, entitling the assessee to claim benefits for the assessment year 1992-93. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the relocation did not disqualify the assessee from availing the exemption under Section 10(B) as there was only one unit in Bangalore with lawful permission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>