<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 611 - Chhattisgarh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210380</link>
    <description>HC held that surrendered amount identified by survey as excess stock (88,918) constituted income under section 69B, representing undisclosed investment for which the assessee could not explain the source. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the amount did not qualify as business income was upheld, since it was not reflected as a direct addition to taxable business income but recorded through the trading account/profit and loss account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 611 - Chhattisgarh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210380</link>
      <description>HC held that surrendered amount identified by survey as excess stock (88,918) constituted income under section 69B, representing undisclosed investment for which the assessee could not explain the source. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the amount did not qualify as business income was upheld, since it was not reflected as a direct addition to taxable business income but recorded through the trading account/profit and loss account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>