https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210375 The High Court held that the 'intimation' under Section 16(1) of the Wealth Tax Act was appealable and constituted an 'order'. It criticized the Commissioner for dismissing the revision petitions, emphasizing the Commissioner's authority to invoke revisional powers. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the Commissioner's order and directing a fresh decision on the revision petitions in accordance with the law, reinstating them for further consideration by the Commissioner of Wealth Tax. en-us Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210375 The High Court held that the 'intimation' under Section 16(1) of the Wealth Tax Act was appealable and constituted an 'order'. It criticized the Commissioner for dismissing the revision petitions, emphasizing the Commissioner's authority to invoke revisional powers. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the Commissioner's order and directing a fresh decision on the revision petitions in accordance with the law, reinstating them for further consideration by the Commissioner of Wealth Tax. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210375