https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210372 An anti-dumping challenge was held to be confined to the statutory review route after the appellants had already invoked writ jurisdiction on the same final findings and were directed to pursue review before the designated authority. The appellate forum applied the principles of finality and bar against repeated litigation, reflecting the underlying approach of Section 11 and Order II of the Code of Civil Procedure. On that basis, a parallel statutory appeal on the same subject matter was treated as not maintainable, and the earlier writ proceedings were taken to have concluded the challenge. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210372 An anti-dumping challenge was held to be confined to the statutory review route after the appellants had already invoked writ jurisdiction on the same final findings and were directed to pursue review before the designated authority. The appellate forum applied the principles of finality and bar against repeated litigation, reflecting the underlying approach of Section 11 and Order II of the Code of Civil Procedure. On that basis, a parallel statutory appeal on the same subject matter was treated as not maintainable, and the earlier writ proceedings were taken to have concluded the challenge. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210372