<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 669 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210362</link>
    <description>Admissions made by a deceased assessee during search bound the legal representatives in block assessment, and such factual admissions could not be retracted by others. Additions had to rest on seized or corroborative material: unexplained credits and amounts supported by search records were sustained, while items explained by fund-flow statements, ledger entries, cheque trails, or prior returns were deleted or excluded from the block period. Capital gains arising from share transactions were also treated as not assessable as undisclosed income where earlier decisions in the same assessee&#039;s matters had already covered the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 669 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210362</link>
      <description>Admissions made by a deceased assessee during search bound the legal representatives in block assessment, and such factual admissions could not be retracted by others. Additions had to rest on seized or corroborative material: unexplained credits and amounts supported by search records were sustained, while items explained by fund-flow statements, ledger entries, cheque trails, or prior returns were deleted or excluded from the block period. Capital gains arising from share transactions were also treated as not assessable as undisclosed income where earlier decisions in the same assessee&#039;s matters had already covered the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>