<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210361</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s grounds regarding the invalid service of notice and the incorrect charging of interest, directing the AO to charge interest as per the law. The tribunal upheld the disallowance of the deduction under Section 80IB, concluding that the project did not meet the necessary conditions. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, admitting the additional ground but ultimately ruling against the appellant on all substantive issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210361</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s grounds regarding the invalid service of notice and the incorrect charging of interest, directing the AO to charge interest as per the law. The tribunal upheld the disallowance of the deduction under Section 80IB, concluding that the project did not meet the necessary conditions. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, admitting the additional ground but ultimately ruling against the appellant on all substantive issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>