<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 656 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by remanding the issue of alleged low GP for reconsideration and directing the deletion of disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) for payments made to casual laborers and for hire of tractor and trolleys. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) did not address the low GP issue, and ruled in favor of the assessee on the grounds that the payments to casual laborers and for hiring tractors and trolleys did not warrant disallowances under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 656 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by remanding the issue of alleged low GP for reconsideration and directing the deletion of disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) for payments made to casual laborers and for hire of tractor and trolleys. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) did not address the low GP issue, and ruled in favor of the assessee on the grounds that the payments to casual laborers and for hiring tractors and trolleys did not warrant disallowances under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>