<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 651 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210323</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to classify rental income under section 22 of the Act for the assessment year 2000-01, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected as they had previously accepted the classification as income from house property before the Tribunal, precluding them from contesting it later. The court found no substantial legal question to address, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 651 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210323</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to classify rental income under section 22 of the Act for the assessment year 2000-01, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected as they had previously accepted the classification as income from house property before the Tribunal, precluding them from contesting it later. The court found no substantial legal question to address, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>