<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 646 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs.5,00,000 and penalties to Rs.2,00,000 on the appellant-company and Rs.1,00,000 on the Director, emphasizing the importance of past precedents and specific case facts in determining fines and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. Failure to pay within thirty days would render the Commissioner (Appeals) order operative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 646 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs.5,00,000 and penalties to Rs.2,00,000 on the appellant-company and Rs.1,00,000 on the Director, emphasizing the importance of past precedents and specific case facts in determining fines and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. Failure to pay within thirty days would render the Commissioner (Appeals) order operative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>