<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 638 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210309</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in setting aside the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income-Tax Act. The Court found that the Tribunal did not consider the detailed issues identified by the CIT, leading to discrepancies and issues not being addressed in the assessment order. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the revenue, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 638 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210309</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in setting aside the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income-Tax Act. The Court found that the Tribunal did not consider the detailed issues identified by the CIT, leading to discrepancies and issues not being addressed in the assessment order. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the revenue, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>