<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 634 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210302</link>
    <description>Redemption fine was held payable under the Customs Act where imported goods had been confiscated and provisionally released against bond. The confiscation having been upheld, the absence of redemption fine was treated as inconsistent with the statutory scheme governing confiscated goods. On the facts of seizure and provisional release, the order was modified to provide for fine in lieu of confiscation, and the importer was directed to pay the fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 634 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210302</link>
      <description>Redemption fine was held payable under the Customs Act where imported goods had been confiscated and provisionally released against bond. The confiscation having been upheld, the absence of redemption fine was treated as inconsistent with the statutory scheme governing confiscated goods. On the facts of seizure and provisional release, the order was modified to provide for fine in lieu of confiscation, and the importer was directed to pay the fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>