<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 630 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210298</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi allowed the appeals filed by the appellants against the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals). One appeal was remanded back for further consideration on penalty and duty demand, while in another appeal, the penalty was increased from 25% to 100% under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed through remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 630 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210298</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi allowed the appeals filed by the appellants against the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals). One appeal was remanded back for further consideration on penalty and duty demand, while in another appeal, the penalty was increased from 25% to 100% under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed through remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>