https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210297 The judge ruled in favor of the SDR, stating that the appellants must reverse input credit for manufacturing exempted products. Discrepancies in the demanded amount were noted, leading to a remand for re-quantification by the adjudicating authority. The appellants were directed to cooperate by providing relevant records for the reassessment process within a month. The appeal was disposed of through remand for further evaluation of the input credit amount to be reversed. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 May 2012 16:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210297 The judge ruled in favor of the SDR, stating that the appellants must reverse input credit for manufacturing exempted products. Discrepancies in the demanded amount were noted, leading to a remand for re-quantification by the adjudicating authority. The appellants were directed to cooperate by providing relevant records for the reassessment process within a month. The appeal was disposed of through remand for further evaluation of the input credit amount to be reversed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210297