<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 621 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210289</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the disputed parts, used as components for railway breaks, should be classified under &#039;Parts for Railway or Tramway, Locomotives or Rolling Stock&#039; under heading 8607 of the Customs Tariff. The tribunal found that the parts retained the essential character of the finished product and were specifically for railway breaks, not for general use as contended by the Revenue. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the disputed goods were classified under heading 8607.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 13:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 621 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210289</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the disputed parts, used as components for railway breaks, should be classified under &#039;Parts for Railway or Tramway, Locomotives or Rolling Stock&#039; under heading 8607 of the Customs Tariff. The tribunal found that the parts retained the essential character of the finished product and were specifically for railway breaks, not for general use as contended by the Revenue. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the disputed goods were classified under heading 8607.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>