<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 619 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210287</link>
    <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons provided in the application. The appeal, challenging the rejection of a claim for duty remission, was allowed as the intimation by the Superintendent was not an appealable order, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh decision, stressing the significance of affording appellants a fair hearing in administrative proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 619 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210287</link>
      <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons provided in the application. The appeal, challenging the rejection of a claim for duty remission, was allowed as the intimation by the Superintendent was not an appealable order, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh decision, stressing the significance of affording appellants a fair hearing in administrative proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>