<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 611 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the demand of duty to be paid through PLA and the setting aside of penalty and interest, allowing the utilization of Cenvat credit for duty liability under the compounded levy scheme. The appeals filed by Revenue were dismissed as the Tribunal found no merit in the arguments presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 611 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the demand of duty to be paid through PLA and the setting aside of penalty and interest, allowing the utilization of Cenvat credit for duty liability under the compounded levy scheme. The appeals filed by Revenue were dismissed as the Tribunal found no merit in the arguments presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>