<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 607 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed input duty credit for cleanflow items based on previous decisions, modifying the impugned order. However, the eligibility of steel items for credit was remanded for further verification due to insufficient evidence to determine if they were used for eligible purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a detailed examination to establish the steel items&#039; eligibility for cenvat credit in accordance with legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 607 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed input duty credit for cleanflow items based on previous decisions, modifying the impugned order. However, the eligibility of steel items for credit was remanded for further verification due to insufficient evidence to determine if they were used for eligible purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a detailed examination to establish the steel items&#039; eligibility for cenvat credit in accordance with legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>