https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210272 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, confirming the demand for the period 2001 to 20th June 2003 and dropping the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found the extended period invoked by the Revenue was not sustainable due to the assessee informing the department about Modvat credit and excise duty payment on scrap generated. Consequently, the demand was deemed not sustainable, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed with consequential relief. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2012 17:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210272 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, confirming the demand for the period 2001 to 20th June 2003 and dropping the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found the extended period invoked by the Revenue was not sustainable due to the assessee informing the department about Modvat credit and excise duty payment on scrap generated. Consequently, the demand was deemed not sustainable, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed with consequential relief. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210272