<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 600 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur, regarding alleged clandestine removal of excisable goods. The lack of key individuals&#039; statements, reliance on questionable evidence, and absence of corroborative evidence weakened the Revenue&#039;s case. The respondents&#039; non-appearance during the hearing further highlighted the one-sided nature of the proceedings. The decision emphasizes the necessity of thorough investigation and credible evidence in cases involving allegations of clandestine activities for a fair legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 600 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur, regarding alleged clandestine removal of excisable goods. The lack of key individuals&#039; statements, reliance on questionable evidence, and absence of corroborative evidence weakened the Revenue&#039;s case. The respondents&#039; non-appearance during the hearing further highlighted the one-sided nature of the proceedings. The decision emphasizes the necessity of thorough investigation and credible evidence in cases involving allegations of clandestine activities for a fair legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>