https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210262 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) Ghaziabad's order dismissing the appeal due to failure to deposit the demanded amount. The High Court remanded the matter, and during the proceedings, the appellants had already deposited a higher sum. Considering this, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a prompt decision on merits. en-us Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 May 2012 15:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210262 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) Ghaziabad's order dismissing the appeal due to failure to deposit the demanded amount. The High Court remanded the matter, and during the proceedings, the appellants had already deposited a higher sum. Considering this, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a prompt decision on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210262