https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210256 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, DELHI allowed the appeal on merits but held that the demand for interest on supplementary invoices was time-barred, citing a statutory time limit. The Tribunal differentiated the case from precedent and emphasized the importance of adhering to timelines in such matters. The judgment resolved the issue of interest demand based on a rate variation clause in the contract, ultimately favoring the appellant on the merits but dismissing the demand due to limitation. en-us Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 May 2012 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210256 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, DELHI allowed the appeal on merits but held that the demand for interest on supplementary invoices was time-barred, citing a statutory time limit. The Tribunal differentiated the case from precedent and emphasized the importance of adhering to timelines in such matters. The judgment resolved the issue of interest demand based on a rate variation clause in the contract, ultimately favoring the appellant on the merits but dismissing the demand due to limitation. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210256