<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 435 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of excess stock and penalties under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules. The decision was based on the admission of excess goods by the authorized signatory and irregular stock maintenance, despite arguments against the weight&#039;s reliability. The penalties were deemed reasonable considering the excess goods&#039; value, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 435 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of excess stock and penalties under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules. The decision was based on the admission of excess goods by the authorized signatory and irregular stock maintenance, despite arguments against the weight&#039;s reliability. The penalties were deemed reasonable considering the excess goods&#039; value, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>