https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210249 The appeal was filed against the non-granting of a single registration to the factory for the proposed captive power plant and cement plant. The presiding judge found that the lower authorities erred in their decisions and determined that the matter of granting a Single Registration Certificate should be addressed by the Commissioner in Raipur. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the Commissioner was directed to consider the application promptly within a period not exceeding 3 months from the date of the order. en-us Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2012 16:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210249 The appeal was filed against the non-granting of a single registration to the factory for the proposed captive power plant and cement plant. The presiding judge found that the lower authorities erred in their decisions and determined that the matter of granting a Single Registration Certificate should be addressed by the Commissioner in Raipur. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the Commissioner was directed to consider the application promptly within a period not exceeding 3 months from the date of the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210249