<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 424 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to recover wrongly taken Cenvat credit and impose penalties on the appellant, a manufacturer, for invoices issued without actual material supply. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding timely filing of returns and non-receipt of goods were dismissed, as the burden of proof to show receipt of goods rested on them, which they failed to do. The Tribunal distinguished cited precedents due to lack of evidence from suppliers, ultimately upholding the decision to deny the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 424 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to recover wrongly taken Cenvat credit and impose penalties on the appellant, a manufacturer, for invoices issued without actual material supply. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding timely filing of returns and non-receipt of goods were dismissed, as the burden of proof to show receipt of goods rested on them, which they failed to do. The Tribunal distinguished cited precedents due to lack of evidence from suppliers, ultimately upholding the decision to deny the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>