<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 423 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210243</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under Central Excise Rules for default in duty payment, rejecting appellants&#039; financial crisis defense. Penalties were imposed under Rule 27, not Section 11AC. Interest recalculation was ordered, disregarding the daily rate, to align with specified rules and not exceed defaulted duty. The appeals were disposed with Rs.5,000 monthly penalty and interest reassessment, emphasizing fairness in proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 423 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210243</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under Central Excise Rules for default in duty payment, rejecting appellants&#039; financial crisis defense. Penalties were imposed under Rule 27, not Section 11AC. Interest recalculation was ordered, disregarding the daily rate, to align with specified rules and not exceed defaulted duty. The appeals were disposed with Rs.5,000 monthly penalty and interest reassessment, emphasizing fairness in proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>