<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 418 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210238</link>
    <description>Rejection of declared customs value and enhancement of assessable value must follow the prescribed valuation procedure and principles of natural justice. The importer must be informed of the grounds for doubt, given access to the relied-upon comparable import material, and afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing before the value is rejected. Where required, a speaking and appealable order must be issued; enhancement made without disclosure of the basis or compliance with procedure is not sustainable. The matter is to be reconsidered by the original authority in accordance with law, without any finding on the merits of the valuation dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 418 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210238</link>
      <description>Rejection of declared customs value and enhancement of assessable value must follow the prescribed valuation procedure and principles of natural justice. The importer must be informed of the grounds for doubt, given access to the relied-upon comparable import material, and afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing before the value is rejected. Where required, a speaking and appealable order must be issued; enhancement made without disclosure of the basis or compliance with procedure is not sustainable. The matter is to be reconsidered by the original authority in accordance with law, without any finding on the merits of the valuation dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>