<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 413 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210233</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi set aside the denial of credit and penalty imposed by the original authority against the appellant, remanding the matter for fresh consideration due to lack of proper opportunity granted to the appellant. Despite the amendment to section 35A, the Tribunal upheld the validity of the Commissioner (Appeals) remand order based on valid grounds presented. The Tribunal addressed the respondents&#039; conduct during adjudication, noting delays and lack of cooperation, and remanded the matter for reconsideration by the original authority, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity for the appellant to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 413 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210233</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi set aside the denial of credit and penalty imposed by the original authority against the appellant, remanding the matter for fresh consideration due to lack of proper opportunity granted to the appellant. Despite the amendment to section 35A, the Tribunal upheld the validity of the Commissioner (Appeals) remand order based on valid grounds presented. The Tribunal addressed the respondents&#039; conduct during adjudication, noting delays and lack of cooperation, and remanded the matter for reconsideration by the original authority, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity for the appellant to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>