<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 628 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210220</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the initial duty demand order and required de-novo consideration based on additional documents. In the subsequent adjudication, the Appellant&#039;s argument regarding the quality of goods sold under specific invoices was rejected. The Tribunal found the valuation rule applied incorrectly and accepted the Appellant&#039;s cost-based valuation, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 628 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210220</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the initial duty demand order and required de-novo consideration based on additional documents. In the subsequent adjudication, the Appellant&#039;s argument regarding the quality of goods sold under specific invoices was rejected. The Tribunal found the valuation rule applied incorrectly and accepted the Appellant&#039;s cost-based valuation, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>